Research
Working papers
Environmental Externalities of Urban Growth: Evidence from the California Wildfires
Does residential development at the urban edge increase the probability and cost of wildfires
in California? I use geospatial data to show that the probability of wildfires increases as
previously undeveloped land becomes developed, but decreases at higher levels of development
until the probability of wildfire reaches zero. At very low housing densities, an additional
housing unit increases the probability of wildfire by .01-.02 percentage points over a baseline
probability of 1.53. This translates into an increase the probability of wildfire from 1.53 to 4.34
percent when housing density increases from 30 to 130 units per km2. I then calculate costs
for a set of wildfires under counterfactual patterns of housing development. Due to the nonmonotonic
relationship between development and wildfire probability, restricting some but not
all development in fire-prone areas can have a larger impact on wildfire probability. I discuss
how land use restrictions in safe areas relate to higher expected costs of wildfires.
Work in Progress
Right-to-Counsel in Eviction Court and Rental Housing Markets: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from New York
(with Rob Collinson, John Eric Humphries, Scott Nelson, Winnie van Dijk, and Daniel Waldinger)
Time to Approve and Uncertainty in Real Estate Development
Impact of Subnational Responses to a National Crisis: Evidence from Brazil
(with Juan Pablo Chauvin and Edward Glaeser)
Other writings
Who's Talking about their COVID-19 Research? Gender and Research During a Pandemic
(with Alex Albright, Kristen McCormack, and Isabel Harbaugh Macdonald), June 2020